• O'Reilly Law Group

Southern Nevada real estate lawyer: Do we have a consensus?

Updated: Dec 17, 2020

Despite the development of a suite of high-quality forms, the Associated General Contractors of America has historically failed to establish a significant presence in the sale of standard form design, according to a Southern Nevada real estate lawyer with O'Reilly Law Group. Only recently have other trade organizations and associations made significant inroads into the AIA’s lock on standard form agreements.

In 2006, the AGC introduced its new DocuBuilder® AGC Contract Document Software. The documents are available by license agreement through the Internet or on CD-ROM. The software is easy to negotiate and edit, and the contracts provide a reasonably fair and balanced alternate source to the AIA Documents for the consideration of attorneys involved in drafting design and construction contracts.

The most recent addition to the list of standard form documents currently available is the family of documents known as the ConsesusDOCS. (“DOCS” is an acronym for Designers, Owners, Contractors, Sureties.) The ConsensusDOCS are specifically marketed as an alternative to the AIA Documents. ConsensusDOCS literature promotes the documents as “The New United Voice of Construction Contracts” and asks: “What if owners, contractors, subcontractors, designers, and sureties could all agree that a standard contract was fair to all parties?”

While the “D” in DOCS represents involvement by “designers,” notable by their absence are the American Institute of Architects (AIA) and the National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE). The AIA and the NSPE represent the largest and most established voices in the “design” communities. Their absence from participation in the ConsesusDOCS, while significant, is hardly surprising since both the AIA and the NSPE publish their own documents and earn significant annual profits from the sale of those documents. Comment on the omission of the AIA and NSPE is not, however, intended to discount the validity of the ConsensusDOCS. In fact, one searching for contracts with a specific bias or orientation as “pro-owner,” “pro-designer,” or “pro-contractor” would do well to search elsewhere since the drafters of the ConsensusDOCS have made a creditable, good-faith effort to produce contracts that are “in the best interest of a successful project” as opposed to contracts that advance the specific agendas of any given group.

The lawyers at O’Reilly Law Group are familiar with all standard design and construction documents including the ConsensusDocs and can assist designers, constructors, and owners who have been presented with a standard form agreement in understanding that agreement and suggesting appropriate modifications to suit the needs and risks of individual projects.

Contact us at O’Reilly Law Group in Las Vegas today at 702-382-2500. Visit for more information about our Las Vegas law firm.

1 view0 comments

O: (702) 382-2500

F: (702) 384-6266

325 S. Maryland Pkwy Las Vegas, NV 89101-5300

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

©2020 by O’Reilly Law Group. Proudly created with

The information contained in this Website is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice on any subject matter. No recipients of content from this site, clients or otherwise, should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content included in the site without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from an attorney licensed in the recipient's state. The content of this Website contains general information and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. The Firm expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any or all the contents of this Website.

Any information sent to The Firm by Internet e-mail or through the Website is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis. Transmission of information from this Website does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and The Firm (or any attorney associated with the Firm), nor is it intended to do so. The transmission of the Website, in part or in whole, and/or any communication with us via Internet e-mail through this site does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship between us and any recipients.