8 Estate Planning Mistakes Nevada Families Make
Eight estate planning mistakes Nevada families make, from unfunded trusts to stale beneficiary forms, and the NRS rules that decide how each one plays out.
Most estate planning failures are not dramatic. They are quiet gaps that nobody notices until the person who could have fixed them is gone: a trust that owns nothing, a beneficiary form naming a former spouse, a deed signed at a refinance closing that changed how a couple holds title. Each one is generally far easier to correct during life than to sort out afterward.
The patterns below come up repeatedly in Nevada families, and each is tied to a specific rule in the Nevada Revised Statutes so you can check your own documents against it. This is general information about how Nevada law operates, not advice about any particular family or document, and estate planning outcomes depend heavily on facts that only a review of your actual paperwork will reveal.
1. Signing a will that does not meet Nevada's execution requirements
NRS 133.040 requires a will to be in writing and signed by the testator, or by an attending person at the testator's express direction, and attested by at least two competent witnesses who subscribe their names to the will in the presence of the testator. Families sometimes sign at a kitchen table with one witness, or with a witness who steps out of the room partway through.
A document that fails these formalities may not operate at all, which can send the estate through Nevada's intestacy rules instead of the plan the person actually wanted. Nevada also allows the execution to be proved without producing the witnesses years later: under NRS 133.050, the sworn statement of a witness taken as that section provides must be accepted by the court as if it had been taken before the court, and NRS 133.055 treats a signature on a self-proving affidavit or declaration attached to the will as a signature affixed to the will where that is necessary to prove execution.
2. Creating a trust and never transferring assets into it
A revocable living trust controls only what it owns. Signing the trust document is the easy half. Retitling the house, moving brokerage accounts, and updating account ownership is the half that gets postponed and then forgotten.
An unfunded trust can produce the worst of both outcomes: the cost and complexity of a trust, plus a probate anyway for everything left outside it. Because Nevada sorts estates by value, a single stray account can move a family from a small-estate affidavit or a set-aside into a supervised administration. Review titling annually, and again after every property purchase, refinance, rollover, or new account. A trust that owns nothing is an expensive statement of intent.
3. Letting beneficiary designations drift out of date
Retirement plans, life insurance, annuities, and payable-on-death accounts pass by contract to whoever the form names, and that designation generally controls regardless of what a later will says. Divorce, remarriage, a beneficiary's death, or a rollover to a new custodian can leave a form naming someone the owner would never choose today.
Two designations cause outsized trouble: a blank form, and one naming the estate, since either can pull the asset into probate. Pull every form, confirm both primary and contingent beneficiaries, and check whether minor children are named outright, because property left directly to a minor usually requires a court-supervised arrangement before anyone can use it.
4. Assuming community property automatically passes to the survivor
Nevada is a community property state, and many couples assume the survivor simply keeps everything. The title language decides the question. Under NRS 111.064, a right of survivorship does not arise when an estate in community property is created in a married couple, as such, unless the instrument creating the estate expressly declares that the married couple take the property as community property with a right of survivorship.
The same statute provides that the right of survivorship is extinguished whenever either spouse, during the marriage, transfers that spouse's interest in the community property. Couples who relocated to Nevada from a separate property state, or who signed a new deed at a refinance closing without reading it, frequently hold title differently than they believe they do.
5. Treating a handwritten note as a complete plan
Nevada does recognize holographic wills. Under NRS 133.090, such a will is one in which the signature, date and material provisions are written by the hand of the testator, whether or not it is witnessed or notarized. That recognition tempts people to stop there.
In practice, handwritten documents tend to be ambiguous about what happens to the residue, silent about who should serve as personal representative, and vulnerable to disputes over handwriting and capacity. They also do nothing about incapacity during life, coordination with beneficiary designations, or property held in other states. A holographic will is a reasonable stopgap when nothing else exists. It is a poor foundation for a plan meant to last decades.
6. Planning only for death and not for incapacity
Most families need documents that work while everyone is still alive. Nevada addresses these in Chapter 162A, which covers powers of attorney for financial matters at NRS 162A.200 through 162A.660 and durable powers of attorney for health care decisions at NRS 162A.700 through 162A.870.
Without them, a family facing a stroke or a dementia diagnosis may have to petition for a guardianship, which is public, slower, and supervised by the court. Execution details matter: NRS 162A.220 requires the power of attorney to be signed by the principal, or in the principal's conscious presence by another individual directed by the principal, and treats a signature as presumed genuine when acknowledged before a notary public or another individual authorized by law to take acknowledgments. Name successor agents too, since a first choice is not always available when the moment arrives.
7. Misunderstanding what a deed upon death actually does
Nevada permits an owner to name a beneficiary for real property through a deed upon death under NRS 111.655 to 111.699. It is a genuinely useful tool, and it fails quietly when misunderstood.
The deed must be properly executed and recorded before the owner's death, so a signed deed sitting in a drawer accomplishes nothing. It transfers only the owner's interest, subject to existing mortgages and liens, which means the beneficiary generally takes the debt along with the house. It also does not coordinate itself with the rest of a plan. If the named beneficiary dies first, or if the property was meant to fund equal shares for several children, the outcome can contradict the will entirely.
8. Signing the documents and never looking at them again
Estate plans age badly. Children reach adulthood, marriages begin and end, businesses are sold, named agents move away or lose capacity themselves, and property is acquired in other states.
Nevada law shifts as well. The dollar thresholds that decide which probate procedure applies have been raised over the years, so a plan built around older figures may assume a court process the family no longer needs, or overlook one it does. Set a review interval and treat certain events as automatic triggers: a death in the family, a divorce, a birth or adoption, a move across state lines, a significant sale or liquidity event, or a serious medical diagnosis for anyone named in the documents.
| Planning gap | What Nevada law provides | Citation |
|---|---|---|
| Will signed with only one witness | At least two competent witnesses must subscribe their names to the will in the testator's presence | NRS 133.040 |
| Relying on a handwritten will | Valid without witnesses or notarization if signature, date and material provisions are in the testator's hand | NRS 133.090 |
| Assuming survivorship in community property | Survivorship must be expressly declared in the instrument creating the estate | NRS 111.064 |
| No incapacity documents in place | Financial powers of attorney and health care powers of attorney | NRS 162A.200-162A.660; NRS 162A.700-162A.870 |
| Deed upon death signed but not recorded | Must be properly executed and recorded before the owner's death | NRS 111.655-111.699 |
| Original will kept private after a death | Custodian must deliver it to the district court clerk within 30 days of learning of the death | NRS 136.050 |
Terms you may hear
- Testator
- The person who makes a will. Nevada measures the will's validity by the formalities observed at the moment that person signs it.
- Holographic will
- A will in which the signature, date and material provisions are written by the hand of the testator. Valid in Nevada under NRS 133.090 whether or not it is witnessed or notarized.
- Funding a trust
- The act of retitling assets into the name of the trust. A trust governs only the property actually transferred to it, no matter what the document says.
- Durable power of attorney
- An authority that continues to operate after the principal becomes incapacitated, which is precisely when families most need it to work.
- Intestacy
- The default distribution scheme Nevada applies when someone dies without a valid will, allocating property by family relationship rather than by preference.
Questions, answered
No. A will directs who receives property and who administers the estate, but it operates through the probate process rather than around it. Whether court supervision can be avoided generally depends on how assets are titled and whether beneficiary designations or a properly funded trust move property directly.
They often do, but a move is a sensible moment for review. How property is characterized can change when a family relocates between a separate property state and a community property state like Nevada, and agents or trustees named years ago may no longer be practical choices given where everyone now lives.
Nevada permits unusually long-term trusts. Under NRS 111.1031, a nonvested property interest is valid if, among the alternatives the statute provides, it either vests or terminates within 365 years after its creation, which is one reason multigenerational trusts are frequently drafted under Nevada law.
The estate passes under Nevada's intestacy statutes, which distribute property according to family relationship rather than the decedent's wishes. The court also appoints an administrator according to a statutory order of priority, which may not be the person the family would have selected.
Naming a minor outright on a life insurance policy or retirement account commonly creates a problem, because a minor generally cannot receive and manage the funds directly. Families typically address this through a trust or a similar arrangement so the money is managed until an age the parents choose.
A periodic review is worthwhile, and certain events should prompt one regardless of the calendar: a marriage or divorce, a birth or adoption, a death among named beneficiaries or agents, a move to or from Nevada, the sale of a business, or a significant change in health.
Discuss Your Matter With O'Reilly Law Group
For over 50 years, Southern Nevada has trusted O'Reilly Law Group with its most serious legal matters. Tell us about yours.
